Enough with evading the issue, LMU - Los Angeles Loyolan : Board Editorials

Facebook Twitter Pintrest Pintrest Instagram

Enough with evading the issue, LMU

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, September 17, 2012 1:00 am

Transparency. It’s a common theme in Loyolan board editorials about the University’s actions.  But the current Loyolan staff has never been more serious in its call for transparency than now. 

News broke last Tuesday, Sept. 11, that Brother William Farrington, S.J. – who worked at LMU for 15 years, from 1987 to 2002 – has been accused of sexually molesting a former student at San Jose’s Bellarmine College Preparatory and of “improprieties” involving two former students at Jesuit High School near Sacramento – both schools that Farrington worked at prior to arriving at LMU (See “Jesuit accused of sexual molestation spent 15 years working at LMU,” Page 1). Although no lawsuit has been or is currently filed against Farrington, both Bellarmine Prep and Jesuit High’s presidents have called the accusations “credible.”

Both schools made sure to inform hundreds of alumni who attended during Farrington’s tenure, urging anyone who may have been abused by Farrington to come forward. Both presidents wrote letters about the situation, apologizing for the potential harm done. Spokesman for Jesuit High School Jordan Blair is quoted in the Sept. 12 Sacramento Bee article “Ex-Jesuit High teacher accused of inappropriate conduct with student” as saying, “We are acting with full transparency. … We wanted to make sure this information was out there.”

When the Loyolan asked LMU’s Vice President for Communications and Government Relations Kathleen Flanagan whether the University would follow suit, she said, “As far as I know, there was nothing that happened at LMU, so there would be no reason to do it.”

That’s just about the worst reasoning.

As Flanagan said, no accusations of abuse by Farrington during his time at LMU have been reported yet. However, the University’s response to these serious allegations is more than troubling. No one likes to deal with upsetting and delicate situations like this, but that does not warrant inaction. It sounds as though LMU could stand to learn from Bellarmine Prep and Jesuit High School, both of which responded proactively to the situation.

What’s more, if Farrington abused students at former schools, “it’s rationally impossible that he was celibate while he was [at LMU],” according to Patrick Wall, a former Benedictine monk, priest and canon lawyer who has assisted prosecutors and civil lawyers on Roman Catholic sexual abuse cases around the country and been involved in litigation with the Jesuits of the California Province since 2002. Wall added that expert testimony indicates that sexual abuse offenders “can’t stop themselves.” 

The University has a responsibility to alert its alumni to the situation and open lines of communication in case anyone has something to report. No accusations now does not mean there will definitely be no allegations in the future. 

The case gets more troubling. Blair said in the same Sacramento Bee article that when Farrington was removed from Jesuit High School in 1987, he was also barred from working with minors.  As Wall told the Loyolan, “We all know that there are freshmen on campus who are 17 years old, we all know that there are students coming to campus for camps and activities that are under 18 years old and we all know that there are a lot of kids who are on accelerated programs taking college courses. There are opportunities to get to minors [at universities like LMU].”

But whether the University even knew about these allegations and the restrictions placed on Farrington when he came to campus in 1987 remains a mystery. 

So here’s what the Loyolan has to say: Enough with evading the issue, LMU. Be transparent. Tell us the facts. Hopefully, even with this information, no one at LMU during Farrington’s time at the University will come forward. But, with the unfortunate chance that that is not the case, give them the opportunity to tell their story. Reporting abuse takes innumerable levels of strength. Show that you care. Extend your hand. 

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

true

3 comments:

  • Margaret Schettler posted at 11:51 pm on Thu, Sep 20, 2012.

    Margaret Schettler Posts: 1

    . Besides young adults, the LMU community includes families with children and grandchildren from the university staff, faculty and surrounding neighborhood. LMU officials have a responsibility to openly communicate the allegations about Farrington's abuse of minors in order to encourage potential witnesses and victims to speak up, and to get help. It's just common sense to assume Farrington had a circle of friends and acquaintances outside of the Jesuit residence.
    I am surprised that a plan was not already in place at LMU to deal with a situation like this. As an LMU graduate I have been especially saddened over the past decade to learn of more than one Jesuit sex offender who was quietly transferred between Jesuit secondary schools, colleges, and outside church ministries when abuse allegations came to light. University officials may not have known Farrington's background when he arrived at LMU in the 1980’s, but now that they know, it's time to do the right thing.

     
  • JudyJones posted at 10:26 am on Thu, Sep 20, 2012.

    JudyJones Posts: 2

    Let's hope that every person who saw, suspected or may have been harmed by Farrington, will find the courage and strength to speak up and call police, not church or school officials.
    Keep in mind that child predators rarely have only one victim. And your silence only hurts, and by speaking up there is a chance for healing, exposing the truth, and therefore protecting others.

    Judy Jones, SNAP Midwest Associate Director, USA, 636-433-2511. snapjudy@gmail.com,
    (SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests,) is the worlds oldest and largest support group for clergy abuse victims.
    SNAP was founded in 1988 and has more than 12,000 members. Despite the word priest in our title, we have members who were molested by religious figures of all denominations, including nuns, rabbis, bishops, and Protestant ministers and increasingly, victims who were assaulted in a wide range of institutional settings like summer camps, athletic programs, Boy Scouts, etc.

     
  • Tim Lennon posted at 9:15 am on Mon, Sep 17, 2012.

    Tim Lennon Posts: 1

    Tragically many in the church hierarchy, at best, have a "hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil" attitude towards child sex abuse of children. While we have seen systematic complicity in cover ups of child sex abuse in the Archdiocese of LA, San Diego, Boston, Philadelphia, KC, etc. we have not seen a truly reformed church hierarchy that will protect children.
    Notification of those who have been placed in danger is demanded.
    If you have been abused or know of someone who has then call the police. The Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (www.SNAPnetwork.org) provides support.

     

MORE OPINION

    • 5 things to have an opinion about

    • Rule of Thumb

    • Free speech in relation to technology

    • Are we ready for real world challenges?

    • Why do we care so much about the lives of celebrities?

    • Pope Francis serves as model during refugee crisis

    • Gentrification: social injustice in LMU's backyard

    • Rule of Thumb

    • Convos on Campus

    • Are quarter life crises the new norm?

    • Tech is necessary for the classroom

    • Iggy's Insights

    • Board Editorial: Journalistic integrity in the midst of controversy

    • Rape victims should not be punished

    • Latest incidents highlight a lack of respect at LMU